> I was able to get VV installed using Sun's latest Java. Success.I'd hate to think I just got lucky! ) Hope this has been helpful! I'd like to know if someone can repeat my In the order mentioned in the ViaVoice documents.which may be important as I did no special configuration of rpm.just emerged it. > there's nothing else to it and this quirk must be due to your setup of > What happens if you don't? rpm reorders according to dependencies, Based on the files above.do you have a later There was no report of failure.I saw that the files had not been edited the Version 9.1 (I'm assuming a 2.6 kernel, though I didn't check)Ġ000:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. SuSE system (this is at work.no way to check right now): > (the name of the card, and the relevant line from lspci). > (the output of rpm -qa|grep -i viavo), sound system, and sound hardware > software and versions you used - this includes distro, viavoice rpms Can you also post the critical info of what Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header Upgrade to SuSE 9.2 as soon as I get my hands on it, and should haveĪnother go at VV then (I'm not currently using it). Totally binary incompatible with contemporary Linux distros!! I'll The main thing I take out of your experience is that viavoice is not yet > success.I'd hate to think I just got lucky! ) > Hope this has been helpful! I'd like to know if someone can repeat my These differences are why it's important to specify versions carefully. With the Mandrake viavoice I'mĬertain you can install all 4 rpms with the same invocation of rpm. Rpms from IBM's boxed set, their dependencies aren't correctly specifiedĪnd order of installation matters. > in the order mentioned in the ViaVoice documents.which may be important asĪs you say, gentoo doesn't use rpm, so it's theoretically possible that > I did no special configuration of rpm.just emerged it. As you have a different viavoice version this The patch didn't apply, and the chunks which failed (possibly all) were > There was no report of failure.I saw that the files had not been edited the > some screen output of the patch failure? > Strange, I can't think of a reason for this. > SuSE system (this is at work.no way to check right now): The runtime you've got is likely the updated one IBM provided forĭownload at some stage. > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal On Mon, at 10:30:09AM -0400, Jessica Perry Hekman wrote: But the widgets were dissapearing suddenly. This led me to try with j2sdk1.4.2_04 that I already had and found that viavoice works with that as well. In such a case one can direcly modify those "java. No binary patches, no text patches!Įditing of viavoice related start scripts are only required if there are multiple versions of java installed. Mine is available in /etc/bashrc pointing to /usr/java/jdk1.5.0/bin), ViaVoice runtime (3.0-1.2) and then xvoice rpm. Just install JDK1.5.0 (That includes setting the path in a suitable place. Can someone help me get rid of these?Ĭ:\Program Files\Common Files\Symantec Shared\ccSetMgr.exeĬ:\Program Files\Common Files\Symantec Shared\ccEvtMgr.Because of the recent voice over JDK1.5.0, I also felt like giving it a try on Fedora Core 2 (2.6.8-1.521). I'm using Norton Anti-Virus Protection, and it keeps scanning and deleting those things but they keep coming back.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |